| |
G0FTD > ARRL 06.11.04 15:56l 22 Lines 872 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AC7542G0FTD
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: The ARRL Letter. Nov 5. 2004
Path: DB0FHN<DB0CL<DB0PDF<DB0SM<PI8DAZ<DB0ACC<DB0FHK<DB0FBB<DB0BI<DB0PRA<
ON0RET<DB0RES<ON0AR<7M3TJZ<ZL2TZE<GB7YFS<GB7CIP<GB7SXE
Sent: 041106/1019Z @:GB7SXE.#38.GBR.EU #:11625 [Hastings] FBB7.00i $:AC7542G0FT
From: G0FTD@GB7SXE.#38.GBR.EU
To : ARRL@WW
> The FCC maintains that BPL emissions are localized and at low enough
> levels to preclude harmful interference in the first place, and it has
> left the door open to possibly upping the limit in the future.
I wonder if the FCC are aware of the experimental amateur beacons using
nano and microwatt outputs being received upto a thousand or so miles
away ? The same sort of leakage level I'd expect from a BPL radiator.
Oh hang on a minute ... technical reasons shouldn't interfere (pardon
the pun) with the Capitalist dream eh ;-)
Still us Brits can't gloat too much as our OFCOM are pretty much the
same. That's why RADIO was controlled by the Dept of TRADE and INDUSTRY,
never mind the principles of engineering but just keep changing the
rules so that consumers are forced to spend money on new equipment.
- Andy -
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
