| |
ZL3AI > APRDIG 11.07.06 01:14l 104 Lines 3369 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 8371-ZL3AI
Read: GUEST
Subj: [APRSSIG] Vol 25 #8, 1/1
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<DB0PM<DB0PV<DB0MRW<DK0WUE<7M3TJZ<ZL2BAU
Sent: 060710/2303Z @:ZL2BAU.#87.NZL.OC #:57958 [Waimate] $:8371-ZL3AI
From: ZL3AI@ZL2BAU.#87.NZL.OC
To : APRDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Kenwood D700 and anti-tracker functions (KC2MMI (Jared))
2. Re: Kenwood D700 and anti-tracker functions (KC2MMI (Jared))
3. RE: Kenwood D700 and anti-tracker functions (scott_at_opentrac.org)
4. Re: aprssig Digest, Vol 25, Issue 7 (Wayne Hamilton)
5. Re: Kenwood D700 and anti-tracker functions (James Washer)
6. Re: Kenwood D700 and anti-tracker functions (Stan - N0YXV)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 15:24:33 -0400
From: "KC2MMI \(Jared\)" <kc2mmi_at_verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [aprssig] Kenwood D700 and anti-tracker functions
"This is "Anti-Tracker" ?! Makes no sense!"
The phrase "anti-tracker" itself makes no sense, it sounds like an exercise
in high-falutin illiteracy. An "anti-tracker" would logically be a box that
actively blocks tracking devices, or corrupts their data, or in some other
was was "anti" meaning "against" trackers.
By any other name a rose would smell as sweet and all that other good
stuff, but please....
------------------------------
[duplicate]
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:10:31 -0700
From: <scott_at_opentrac.org>
Subject: RE: [aprssig] Kenwood D700 and anti-tracker functions
I think the name is something Darryl came up with to describe his device,
and since there was no other term in use, it's been adopted to generically
describe anything of that type. If Darryl's naming process is anything
like mine, then he probably spent about 10 seconds staring at a 'New
Project' window before typing in whatever came to mind. So don't blame him
too much, I'm sure he didn't intend to start this!
Scott
N1VG
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 20:09:58 -0500
From: "Wayne Hamilton" <hamilton122_at_insightbb.com>
Subject: [aprssig] Re: aprssig Digest, Vol 25, Issue 7
how about "passive tracking", a la "passive sonar"?
wayne, ab9fj
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:26:17 -0700
From: James Washer <washer_at_trlp.com>
Subject: Re: [aprssig] Kenwood D700 and anti-tracker functions
No did I when I asked a simple technical question about a given radio's
capabilities...
And yes, I was using the term coined by someone (Darryl) to describe an
APRS->GPS->Waypoint device..
Hmmmm, maybe that's the name for it.. l2w (location-to-waypoint)
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:10:31 -0700
>I think the name is something Darryl came up with to describe his device,
>and since there was no other term in use, it's been adopted to generically
>describe anything of that type. If Darryl's naming process is anything like
>mine, then he probably spent about 10 seconds staring at a 'New Project'
>window before typing in whatever came to mind. So don't blame him too much,
>I'm sure he didn't intend to start this!
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 21:52:08 -0500
From: Stan - N0YXV <n0yxv_at_gihams.org>
Subject: [aprssig] Re: Kenwood D700 and anti-tracker functions
How about SRPA (Sequential Realtime Packet Actualizer)the un APRS? You
could even pronounce it "Sarpa".
------------------------------
aprssig mailing list
aprssig_at_lists.tapr.org
https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
End of aprssig Digest, Vol 25, Issue 8
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
