OpenBCM V1.13 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
I0OJJ  > ANTENN   04.07.10 00:35l 39 Lines 1539 Bytes #-5793 (0) @ WW
BID : 61123I0OJJ
Read: GUEST DG1NDE DG7NCH
Subj: Re: Antenna Question Re HF Handhelds
Path: DB0FHN<DB0MRW<DB0ERF<OK0NHD<OK0PHL<OK0PCC<OM0PBC<OK0PPL<DB0RES<DK0WUE<
      IK6ZDE<I4UKI<I0OJJ
Sent: 100703/2036z @:I0OJJ.ILAZ.ITA.EU #:6865 $:61123i0ojj

On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 14:52:15 -0400, Bob <rgsros@notme.invalid> wrote:

>I have a long end fed antenna for my listening.
>Obviously they have a short "something" antenna.
>
>How effective is a short "something" around 5 to 10 MHz, e.g. ?
>
>How can it work down there at all ?
>
>I can visualize s tuned ferrite loop, such as the very old fashioned AM 
>table radios used to have, but wouldn't this only be effective over a 
>very small range ?

Hi Bob,

A make and model number would get you a more definitive answer.
However, for the broader question, and as you undoubtedly expect, more
antenna is better - to a point.  Some will argue, theoretically,
otherwise.  I go with results.

When I was in South Africa (no, not the World Cup), I took along one
of Radio Shack's cheapest SW radios.  It had the conventional whip,
and it offered the conventional whimp.  However, having foresight, I
also took along about 20 feet of wirewrap wire with a quarter taped
onto one end.  At the close of day, I would wrap one end around the
shortened whip and  I would toss the quarter into the rafters (we
stayed in thatched covered huts), all of a ten or fourteen foot
height; and signals came booming in from all over the continent and
Europe.

Another thing missing from these small jobs are a tuned front end.  In
fact, you can spend a lot of money on SW radios and still not get
front end tuning.  A preselector, or simple antenna tuner (as cheap as
one as you can find, or build one for $10) will go far, far, far.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC



Read previous mail | Read next mail


 16.05.2026 22:37:48lGo back Go up