| |
G0FTD > ANT 22.05.06 13:49l 31 Lines 927 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 214644G0FTD
Read: DL7NDF GUEST
Subj: Re: Antenna competion (G0FTD)
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0SIF<DB0ROF<DB0ACH<DB0MKA<DB0ACC<PI8DAZ<DB0RES<DK0WUE<
7M3TJZ<ZL2BAU<GB7YKS<GB7SYP<GB7ESX<GB7NNA
Sent: 060522/1218z @:GB7NNA.#31.GBR.EU #:07162 $:214644G0FTD [Witham, Esx]NNA
VK3ABK wrote:-
> Look at the 'efficiency' of the latest effort from G0FTD....
>
> " You could have a 2cm antenna on 80m and achieve 100% efficiency, but it
> will still produce a lousy signal."
>
> And, what has this got to do with it ?....
>
> "Haven't you heard of the term "effective aperture" yet ?"
>
> (Who is he quoting " " , anyway?)
>
> - &y - (There's that ampersand back again.)
>
> Can anyone tell us how a "2cm antenna on 80m" can have an 'efficiency' of
> 100%. (100% of what, we should ask!) AND! "...still produce a lousy
> signal."
Now you really have surprised me or are you pretending to be a comedian ?
(We don't need anymore - John Howard does a good job on your behalf) <grin>
I think you need to do a bit more studying of the fundamentals of
antenna's before questioning my rationale.
Who knows - you might learn something.
Perhaps you are suffering from a Vegemite defeciency ? ;-)
- &y -
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
