OpenBCM V1.13 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
W5DXP  > ANTENN   20.05.05 21:38l 37 Lines 1297 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 4287817D$1_2
Read: GUEST DF5NK
Subj: Re: High Impedance Feedlines = Lower Loss - Why ?
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0SIF<DB0EA<DB0RES<DK0WUE<7M3TJZ<SV1CMG<LU1KBK<LU4EGV<
      LU4EGV<KB9MMA<lu4egv<G8LMC
Sent: 050515/1805Z @:G8LMC.AMPR.ORG HamServ V2.66

Cecil Moore wrote:
> Reg Edwards wrote:
> 
>> The complete equation is -
>>
>> Attenuation = R/2/Ro + G*Ro/2  Nepers
>>
>> where G is the conductance of the dielectric, which is small for
>> materials such as polyethylene and Teflon.  And 1 Neper = 20/Ln(10) =
>> 8.686 dB.
> 
> 
> Reg, I didn't disagree with your equation. I disagreed with this
> statement of yours:
> 
>> The number one reason for attenuation being higher is because the
>> conductor diameter is smaller and, as a consequence, its resistance is
>> higher.

As an illustrated example: Assume a parallel feedline made from #24
wire and having a characteristic impedance of 600 ohms.

What size would the wire in 50 ohm coax have to be to equal the HF
matched line loss of the #24 600 ohm line? (The wire in the coax has
to be 12 times as conductive as the wire in the parallel feedline in
order to offset the effect of Z0.)

A rough estimate indicates that the #24 600 ohm line has approximately
the same matched line loss as RG-213 with its #13 wire.
-- 
73, Cecil  http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 30.06.2026 08:46:04lGo back Go up