| |
G1KQH > AMSAT 16.03.05 23:17l 23 Lines 501 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : BA1645G1KQH
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Ham sats - no longer worth it?
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0MRW<DB0WUE<DK0WUE<SP7MGD<IZ0AWG<ON0BEL<W1NGL<CX2SA<
GB7YFS<GB7CIP<GB7COV<GB7COV
Sent: 050316/1432Z @:GB7COV.#29.GBR.EU #:17439 [Coventry] $:BA1645G1KQH
From: G1KQH@GB7COV.#29.GBR.EU
To : AMSAT@WW
G8TZJ wrote:-
> How many ACTIVE sat users have responded to your bull? That may give you a
> TRUE'er picture of what frequencies are used.
Yes I have to agree on this too! We have about 3 in the involved in thread
at the moment and its out at WW, so where are they all?
Mind you how many use Packet these days?
73 - Steve, G1KQH @ GB7COV
Message timed: 14:29 on 16 Mar 05
Message sent using WinPack V6.80 (R)
RSGB Member since 1982. GQRP 11049
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
