| |
G4WYW > ALL 14.01.06 22:14l 49 Lines 2020 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 459645G4WYW
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: g4ebt sadly missed
Path: DB0FHN<DB0MRW<DB0FSG<DB0AAB<F6KFT<LX0PAC<ON0LGE<ON0DXC<ON0RET<DB0RES<
ON0AR<GB7FCR
Sent: 060114/2009Z @:GB7FCR.#16.GBR.EU #:23103 [Blackpool] FBB-7.03a $:459645G4
From: G4WYW@GB7FCR.#16.GBR.EU
To : ALL@WW
G6HJP wrote:-
> Talk about Packet Police, look how they all come out of the woodwork
> like scampering Termites when a word they cannot put a meaning to is
> written on packet.
It really is like the Pot calling the Kettle black. He refers to others
as "Packet Police" when it it is himself that is acting like one. It is
not "a word they cannot put a meaning to" that has caused some to comment
on his message but his insidious insinuation that G4EBT had written as
if David had done some unlawful act!
G6HJP and a few others may try to twist the facts in an attempt to make us
who defend G4EBT look bad, but the fact remains that *we* write regularly
concerning all manner of subjects and not just to have a moan or complain
about one of the most upright citizens that I have ever met. Why couldn't
G6HJP have sent to @GBR instead of deliberately sending his mischievious
message to @WW, knowing full well what a furore he would be creating?
> No wonder people are leaving this mode like flies, as you always get
> some poeple who just live on "piles of s**t" speading their smells to
> anyone who comes within range.
Pity G6HJP's "filters" didn't trap his your own output because his insult
shown above with asterisks to avoid being trapped by other filters on the
network, is a far more insulting remark than any ever seen from G4EBT.
> So to all this so called educated persons out there in packet world,
> stick your comments, I run my BBS as I feel fit.
It seems that a nerve has been touched causing G6HJP to reveal his true
colours above.
> Bye til the next outburst from the PP people on packet.
If I recall correctly, it was *he* that had the outburst, sending his
message to proclaim that it was a "good thing" that G4EBT was no longer
sending.
I haven't seen any messages from G6HJP's "users" of his BBS agreeing
with him. Could that be because he doesn't have any?
73 - Mel, G4WYW @ GB7FCR.#16.GBR.EU
Message timed: 20:10 UTC on 14 Jan 06
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
