| |
M1CUK > ALL 13.01.06 22:55l 81 Lines 2864 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 8A9635M1CUK
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: g4ebt sadly missed
Path: DB0FHN<DB0MRW<DB0WUE<DK0WUE<DB0RES<ON0AR<GB7FCR
Sent: 060113/2120Z @:GB7FCR.#16.GBR.EU #:22896 [Blackpool] FBB-7.03a $:8A9635M1
From: M1CUK@GB7FCR.#16.GBR.EU
To : ALL@WW
G4WYW wrote:-
>
>
> Concerning David G4EBT not sending to WW and several
> stations comments that he is "sadly missed".
> G6HJP wrote:-
>> From my point of view it will only mean that I will >> now spend a lot less time at the keyboard,
>> unholding held messages that had banable words in!
>> So thats a good thing, I am sure someone will soon >> replace his messages.
>> Peter, Sysop - G6HJP @ GB7PFD.#48.GBR.EU
> The word "banable" used by G6HJP cannot be found in
> my Oxford Full Edition Dictionary but I am assuming
> that G6HJP means held messages that had words
> in them that would need to be "banned"?
more likely to be words that he cant understand..
a good education would have helped but such is life,
not everyone can understand what's been written..
> In all the material that I have ever read of David's
> I have never seen any word that would fit the above
> accusation. Of course, if it had been held
> then I wouldn't be able to!
There has NEVER been a message sent by David that I have had the need to
kill because of the words he used
in the message, nor has there ever been a message sent by David that was
held by the filters here because of
the message content, the only reason David's messages get held here was
the same reason that all other messages entered directly in to the bbs..
That as the sysop of the originating bbs I am required to check all
bulls that are entered directly in to the bbs, hence all telnet and RF
users messages get checked by the filters and then either released
automatically
or held for further review by myself or my remote sysop, as required by
the nov.
> Perhaps G6HJP could enlighten us as to which words he
> means, even if it entails substituting certain
> letters with asterisks or such like?
he would, but I somehow think he will have trouble
spelling them correctly let alone knowing what they mean...
> I'm sure that others would be as interested as
> myself to know exactly!
yes we would like to see exactly what he thinks constitutes a word
worthy of being banned from a bbs..
I know how I operate the system here complies fully with the terms of
the nov and that I ensure messages
that would contravene the terms of my nov wont make it on to the bbs
network.
just a shame that some packet police act like little Hitler's and see
fit to delete message content that should be allowed free passage on the
network..
73
Trev,
SysOp gb7fcr.#16.gbr.eu
E-Mail trev@gb7fcr.co.uk
Packet Radio <-> InterNet Gateway - RF & Telnet access
BBS Web Site http://www.gb7fcr.co.uk
WinPack Web Site http://www.winpack.org.uk
Message timed: 21:20 on 13 Jan 06
Message sent using WinPack-Telnet V6.80
Text that follows is a Random Tagline.
"Do not thwart an enemy returning home." -Sun Tzu
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
