OpenBCM V1.13 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
N0KFQ  > TODAY    21.07.10 17:16l 81 Lines 3860 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 12508_N0KFQ
Read: VE7HFY GUEST
Subj: Today in History - Jul 21
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<OE5XBL<OE2XEL<OE6XPE<DB0RES<DK0WUE<IK6ZDE<IW0QNL<IR2UBX<
      IW8PGT<CX2SA<VE3UIL<N9PMO<VE1MPF<N0KFQ
Sent: 100721/1505Z @:N0KFQ.#SWMO.MO.USA.NA #:12508 [Branson] FBB7.00i $:12508_N
From: N0KFQ@N0KFQ.#SWMO.MO.USA.NA
To  : TODAY@WW


Jul 21, 1925:
Monkey Trial ends

In Dayton, Tennessee, the so-called "Monkey Trial" ends with 
John Thomas Scopes being convicted of teaching evolution in 
violation of Tennessee law. Scopes was ordered to pay a fine of 
$100, the minimum the law allowed.

In March 1925, the Tennessee legislature had passed the 
anti-evolution law, making it a misdemeanor punishable by fine 
to "teach any theory that denies the story of the Divine 
Creation of man as taught in the Bible, and to teach instead 
that man has descended from a lower order of animals." With 
local businessman George Rappalyea, Scopes had conspired to get 
charged with this violation, and after his arrest the pair 
enlisted the aid of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) to 
organize a defense. Hearing of this coordinated attack on 
Christian fundamentalism, William Jennings Bryan, the three-time 
Democratic presidential candidate and a fundamentalist hero, 
volunteered to assist the prosecution. Soon after, the great 
attorney Clarence Darrow agreed to join the ACLU in the defense, 
and the stage was set for one of the most famous trials in U.S. 
history.

On July 10, the trial got underway, and within a few days hordes 
of spectators and reporters had descended on Dayton as preachers 
set up revival tents along the city's main street to keep the 
faithful stirred up. Inside the Rhea County Courthouse, the 
defense suffered early setbacks when Judge John Raulston ruled 
against their attempt to prove the law unconstitutional and then 
refused to end his practice of opening each day's proceeding 
with prayer.

Outside, Dayton took on a carnival-like atmosphere as an exhibit 
featuring two chimpanzees and a supposed "missing link" opened 
in town, and vendors sold Bibles, toy monkeys, hot dogs, and 
lemonade. The "missing link" was in fact Jo Viens of Burlington, 
Vermont, a 51-year-old man who was of short stature and 
possessed a receding forehead and a protruding jaw. One of the 
chimpanzees--named "Joe Mendi"--wore a plaid suit, a brown 
fedora, and white spats, and entertained Dayton's citizens by 
monkeying around on the courthouse lawn.

In the courtroom, Judge Raulston destroyed the defense's 
strategy by ruling that expert scientific testimony on evolution 
was inadmissible--on the grounds that it was Scopes who was on 
trial, not the law he had violated. The next day, Raulston 
ordered the trial moved to the courthouse lawn, fearing that the 
weight of the crowd inside was in danger of collapsing the 
floor.

In front of several thousand spectators in the open air, Darrow 
changed his tactics and as his sole witness called Bryan to the 
stand in an attempt to discredit his literal interpretation of 
the Bible. In a searching examination, Bryan was subjected to 
severe ridicule and forced to make ignorant and contradictory 
statements to the amusement of the crowd. On July 21, in his 
closing speech, Darrow asked the jury to return a verdict of 
guilty in order that the case might be appealed. Under Tennessee 
law, Bryan was thereby denied the opportunity to deliver the 
closing speech he had been preparing for weeks. After eight 
minutes of deliberation, the jury returned with a guilty 
verdict, and Raulston ordered Scopes to pay a fine of $100. 
Although Bryan had won the case, he had been publicly humiliated 
and his fundamentalist beliefs had been disgraced. Five days 
later, on July 26, he lay down for a Sunday afternoon nap and 
never woke up.

In 1927, the Tennessee Supreme Court overturned the verdict on a 
technicality but left the constitutional issues unresolved until 
1968, when the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a similar Arkansas 
law on the grounds that it violated the First Amendment.

N0KFQ @ N0KFQ.#SWMO.MO.USA.NA
Using "Outpost Lite" Ver 2.2.1 c85



Read previous mail | Read next mail


 24.06.2026 04:22:46lGo back Go up