OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
KB2VXA > 50MHZ    30.12.05 17:40l 40 Lines 1690 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 47658_NJ2AR
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: VK6BE > magic band
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0SIF<DB0EA<DB0RES<DK0WUE<I0TVL<CX2SA<WA7V<N1URO<
      K2PUT<WA2AHR<WB2QJA<KC2COJ<NJ2AR
Sent: 051230/1400Z @:NJ2AR.#CNJ.NJ.USA.NOAM #:47658 [Lakehurst] $:47658_NJ2AR
From: KB2VXA@NJ2AR.#CNJ.NJ.USA.NOAM
To  : 50MHZ@WW

Hi Bob and readers,

Oh never mind Szigy and his Portnoy's Complaint, maybe he has some 
frustration to vent like we all do from time to time. Seems to me he has 
because it has nothing to do with 6M per se, rather a general complaint 
about the frustrating changes that have happened to Amateur Radio, not 
all have been good. One must adapt or go the way of the dinosaurs, one 
way I have is taking advantage of contests to check out how well my 
station is performing since they sure bring hams out of the woodwork. 
When there's one going on VHF I love to hand out points to some of my 
favorites, mostly clubs I know and many are way out there at the fringe 
of my coverage area, just a bit of a challenge you know.

OK, so you can't hear the beacons but niether can I since I'm now too far 
from the only one I used to hear regularly in Philadelphia. Well, when I 
DO hear one I know something's happening and after all, that's what 
they're for in the first place. More often than not the first indication 
is chatter on 50.125 where I leave the receiver sitting whenever I'm in 
the shack. On 10M it's 28.400 which seems to be an unofficial calling 
frequency and a popular spot for local groups.

No big deal, there's ALWAYS something happening somewhere, that's why we 
have more than 40 channels on 11M to play with.

73 de Warren, KB2VXA@NJ2AR.#CNJ.NJ.USA.NOAM
Powered by JCP&L atomic energy.

E-MAIL: warren@kb2vxa.net

**************************************
Preserve the integrity of our network.
Stop Internet forwarding, use RADIO!
**************************************

Message timed by NIST: 11:46 on 2005-Dec-30 GMT



Read previous mail | Read next mail


 02.04.2025 09:44:26lGo back Go up