| |
VK2ZRG > TECH 23.05.06 08:44l 19 Lines 539 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 2472_VK2ZRG
Read: DL1LCA GUEST
Subj: Re: Possible error in ARRL Handbook
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0SIF<HB9EAS<DB0FSG<DB0MRW<DK0WUE<DB0RES<ON0AR<ZL2BAU<
VK7AX<VK2TGB<VK2IO<VK2WI
Sent: 060523/0546Z @:VK2WI.#SYD.NSW.AUS.OC #:15524 [SYDNEY] FBB7 $:2472_VK2ZRG
From: VK2ZRG@VK2WI.#SYD.NSW.AUS.OC
To : TECH@WW
VK2ZRG/TPK 1.83d Msg #:2472 Date:23-05-06 Time:5:43Z
Hello Paul M0CNL and readers,
Thanks for the list Paul. I note that chromium is listed as 1.8E-7 and
Aluminium as 2.65E-8. Quite a difference! So far no two books or sources
agree on the resistivity of chromium. This may be due to the measurement
temperature as I mentioned in a previous bulletin.
73s from Ralph VK2ZRG@VK2WI.#SYD.NSW.AUS.OC
Taglines by Colin Coker G4FCN
C Program run, C Program Crash...ReWrite in Pascal!
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
