| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 15.10.99 15:25l 254 Lines 7710 Bytes #-9718 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_99_259B
Read: DL6KCF GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 99/259B
Path: DB0AAB<DB0ZKA<DB0ABH<DB0BOX<DB0MAK<OK0PKL<OK0PPR<OK0PPL<OK0POK<9A0YRB<
PP5BLU<IW9EXL<SV1AAW<SV1AAW<EA7URC<PE0MAR<PI8VNW
Sent: 991015/0943Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:8049 [HvHolland] FBB7.00g $:HD_99_259
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA21308 ; Fri, 15 Oct 99 09:08:08 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.67/7.5.3) with SMTP
id AA00016394 ; Fri, 15 Oct 99 08:02:45 MET
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 99 08:00:38 MET
Message-Id: <hd_99_259B>
From: pa2aga
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga
Subject: HamDigitalDigest 99/259B
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
I don't plan to make that versions.
73!
Sergei,
UA9OSV
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
>.
------------------------------
Date: 13 Oct 1999 05:04:37 GMT
From: pmunsel@aol.com (PMunsel)
Subject: Packet with an HT
I have been successful with a couple of Kenwood HT's, a Yaesu, and the Radio
Shack HTX 202 and 404. The thing I did when I was having trouble, was to
seperate the computer, radio, and TNC as much as I could, and I also put 2
Radio Shack toroids on the cable near the radio. The toroids did a lot to
help.
I feel this was needed mainly dur to the close proximity of the antenna and
the
other gear. Hope this helps some of you having trouble.
73,
Paul Munsel N5XMV
>.
------------------------------
Date: 13 Oct 1999 06:18:21 GMT
From: lette@unnilpentium.chem.vu.nl (Marcel Lette)
Subject: Packet with an HT
PMunsel (pmunsel@aol.com) wrote:
: I have been successful with a couple of Kenwood HT's, a Yaesu, and the Radio
: Shack HTX 202 and 404. The thing I did when I was having trouble, was to
: seperate the computer, radio, and TNC as much as I could, and I also put 2
: Radio Shack toroids on the cable near the radio. The toroids did a lot to
help.
: I feel this was needed mainly dur to the close proximity of the antenna and
the
: other gear. Hope this helps some of you having trouble.
: 73,
: Paul Munsel N5XMV
Hi,
The setup i use is a Standard C-588 and a PC running Winpack/AGW/Baycom.
It works like a dream. Especially SV2AGW's packet engine.
73's Marcel - PE1GDK
_______________________________________________________________________________
| I do the alphabet dieet, day 1 eat things starting with "A", almond pie
|
| " 2 " " " " "B", blueberry pie
|
| " 3 " " " " "C", custard pie...
|
| Don't look at: http://huizen.dds.nl/~pe1gdk !!! email: pe1gdk@dds.nl
|
| mailto:`echo 'pe1gdk dds'|awk '{print$1"@"$2".nl"}'`
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>.
------------------------------
Date: 12 Oct 1999 09:10:28 -0700
From: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@netcom.com>
Subject: PACTOR or AMTOR
n8blk@aol.com (Art Clemons) writes:
>
> In article <7toqln$29c8$1@arachne.labyrinth.net.au>, Hamish Moffatt
> <hamish@rising.com.au> writes:
>
> >I wish I could -- the sound card is my preferred route. I am already doing
> >1200 packet (on VHF) and PSK31 and Hellschreiber (on HF) using the sound
> >card. The only program I've seen which does PACTOR on the sound card
> >is "PSATOR" for DOS, which only runs on Personal Sound Architecture
> >sound cards. I use a plain SB16, so I can't use it, and there was no
> >source code with it.
> >
> >
>
> The October 99 issue of QST has part one of a relatively simple dedicated
modem
> for RTTY, Amtor & Pactor which can be used with Terman93, which was written
by
> Sailer, and is freeware. While not using the soundcard, about the only
other
> requirement would be a free serial port on your computer and a receiver. I
> note that you're not in the US and probably have a difficult time getting
QST,
> but it would be a worthwhile experiment if you're truly interested in said
> modes. Please note that it only does PACTOR, not PACTOR II.
> -art clemons-
I had a RTTY QSO with K7SZL, the author of the article, and since I
haven't gotten my October QST yet, he suggested his web site,
http://home.att.net/~k7szl, for a preview. I haven't looked yet.
K6STI has a version of RITTY, a soundcard RTTY program that could do
PACTOR (not II), under DOS using a true Soundblaster card, apparently
no "compatibles". He has to pay a license fee to SCS for each copy
sold. RITTY costs money, though.
73, doug
>.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 08:13:27 -0700
From: "Hank Oredson" <horedson@att.net>
Subject: The BBS network and tcp/ip.
Rob Janssen <nomail@pe1chl.demon.nl> wrote in message
news:slrn805t5t.835.nomail@linux.pe1chl.ampr.org...
> Hank Oredson <horedson@att.net> wrote:
>
> >> Then what do you want?
>
> >Ideas.
>
> Ok here is an idea:
>
> What you want already exists. Under Linux. So, the problem is not how to
> write the software itself.
I have Linux.
Did not find any such software.
Most hams do not (and will not) have Linux.
So Linux is not of interest to me.
But in any case I am not looking for solutions. Those I can create.
I am looking for ideas about WHAT problems might be solved,
and how the applications that implement those solutions might
be structured so they would be of interest to hams.
Your points about installation are well taken, and "simple"
installation is a part of what I am working on now.
>.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 17:29:05 GMT
From: nomail@pe1chl.demon.nl (Rob Janssen)
Subject: The BBS network and tcp/ip.
Hank Oredson <horedson@att.net> wrote:
>> Ok here is an idea:
>> What you want already exists. Under Linux. So, the problem is not how to
>> write the software itself.
>I have Linux.
>Did not find any such software.
What software did you not find?
All the standard Internet servers are included in the normal distributions,
lots of HAM software as well, F6FBB has a Linux version of his BBS, and the
gateways can be found on the usual Ham software for Linux sites.
What else do you need?
>Most hams do not (and will not) have Linux.
>So Linux is not of interest to me.
My proposal was a method to let them have Linux. Why do you think
it is not feasible?
Because a HAM will not understand Linux and cannot make changes to the
system? Trust me, a HAM does not understand Windows either, and can only
resort to standard tricks to solve problems (like re-installation).
The situation with Linux is not much different, except that those who WANT
to get in-depth knowledge of the system have the opportunity to study it.
>But in any case I am not looking for solutions. Those I can create.
Solutions have already been created.
Making them available for everyone is what is missing, when I correctly
understand your earlier posting.
Rob
--
+----------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
| Rob Janssen pe1chl@amsat.org | WWWhome: http://www.pe1chl.demon.nl/ |
| AMPRnet: rob@pe1chl.ampr.org | AX.25 BBS: PE1CHL@PI8WNO.#UTR.NLD.EU |
+----------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
>.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 12:11:30 -0700
From: "Hank Oredson" <horedson@att.net>
Subject: The BBS network and tcp/ip.
Rob Janssen <nomail@pe1chl.demon.nl> wrote in message
news:slrn806rv1.bah.nomail@linux.pe1chl.ampr.org...
> Hank Oredson <horedson@att.net> wrote:
>
> >> Ok here is an idea:
>
> >> What you want already exists. Under Linux. So, the problem is not how
to
> >> write the software itself.
>
> >I have Linux.
> >Did not find any such software.
>
> What software did you not find?
Sorry, I won't play this silly game any more.
If you have ideas, post them. If not, post to some other thread.
> All the standard Internet servers are included in the normal
distributions,
> lots of HAM software as well, F6FBB has a Linux version of his BBS, and
To be continued in digest: hd_99_259C
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
